Friday, May 17, 2013

Scott Pilgrim And The Infinite Sadness, Bryan Lee O'Malley

"The full-color, completely remastered, utterly astounding republication of the Scott Pilgrim epic continues! This new 6"x9" hardcover presents Scott's run-in with Ramona ex, Envy boy toy, and The Clash at Demon Head with bassist Todd Ingram as you've never seen it before - in full-color! Plus, previously unpublished extras, hard-to-find short stories, and exclusive bonus materials will make you see Scott Pilgrim in a whole new light!"












Oh man, I just love these books. Everything about them is totally gorgeous, and this third volume, featuring Envy Adams and some of the best battles of the Scott Pilgrim series is a real joy. As soon as I saw it on release I bought it, and read it that evening.

This is a fantastic collected edition, I mentioned in previous reviews how nicely put together they are, and there's not really much to hard. It's of good stock, handsomely coloured and printed on nice thick paper. They look great on my bookshelf, and I'm really pleased that there's another one of these out later in the year.

The colour editions have added a lot to what was an already great story. There are couple of tongue in cheek jokes about the reworking that are excellent - in particular one about Ramona changing her hair colour, with an acknowledgment that it worked better in the (black and white) original. It's not often that a comic makes me laugh out loud, but this did.

Unfortunately it's one of the less immediately comprehensible books, so as well as the usual great dialogue and awesome fights, there's a plot that jumps between multiple time periods and starts out of nowhere. It's easy enough to get caught up but certainly doesn't make it easy for a reader coming in blind.

Still, get round that small issue and you'll find you've got a book that rewards multiple readings - there's little that you'll find that enhances the story, but it's certainly worth doing just for how well done these books are. And if you're going to do that you would be mad not to invest in these books.

Also Try;
Bryan Lee O'Malley, Scott Pilgrim
Kieron Gillen, Young Avengers

Supreme Power: Nighthawk, Daniel Way

"As a boy, Kyle Richmond - the man who would one day become Nighthawk - witnessed the senseless murder of his parents. There was no reason for their deaths, no provocation - they were just simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. It was a traumatic event that has left him scarred for life - and turned him into a hero more feared than the criminals he polices. Now, it's happening again... but on a much larger scale. The people of Chicago - men, women and children - are dying in the streets, victims of a monster whose thirst for slaughter cannot be quenched, whose soul is a bottomless void and whose scars run even deeper than Nighthawk's. Long ago, Kyle Richmond looked into the face of madness - now, it's looking back at him. And it's flashing a killer smile. Collects Supreme Power: Nighthawk #1-6."






The main draw of this is the Steve Dillon art, a guy who is the go to for obscenely sterile violence (read Preacher or The Punisher, and be amazed at the hurt that can be drawn from a guy who doesn't detail his work in any way). Sticking him on an alternative take on Batman vs The Joker is a stoke of genius  and it helps that it's written by Daniel Way, the guy behind some of the best of Deadpool, and another man who's very at home with impressive levels of serious violence.

So there is a competent team in place, and they certainly don't disappoint. Whilst it's an inconsequential tale its nice to see a story that doesn't take its subject matter very seriously. Nighthawk is a character that's rife for this kid of treatment - as a Batman parody he doesn't really work, because he's too in-jokey for the reader. His entire set up in the Supreme Power reality is that of an amoral Billionaire who only intervenes in those cases where he can help black people, and sees everything through a prism of perceived racism.

It's basically taking the concept of Batman as a protector of the weak and turning it to Batman being the protector of some of the weak, the few that are like him, a concept that just makes him ridiculous.

Still, it's amusing to see him breat the crap out of racists and bullies, and his lack of limits make for a refreshing solution when he does confront the joker analogue who is murdering anyone and everyone across Chicago. There's little of substance there, but it works, and it's a nice addition to the Supreme Power universe.

Also Try:
Scott Snyder, Death of the Family
J. Michale Straczynski, Supreme Power
Daniel Way, Thunderbolts
Garth Ennis, Preacher

Supreme Power; High Command, J Michael Straczynski

"In their first adventure as a team, Hyperion, Blur and Nighthawk--the newly formed Squadron--have a long-overdue showdown with the superpowered serial killer who's been terrorizing the nation! But will they live long enough to stop him? Plus: What does the most powerful being on the planet do when he finds out he's been manipulated, and that his whole life is practically a lie? how will Hyperiod react, and what does that mean for the rest of humanity--and the government that's organized these deceitful machinations?"











The Supreme Power books are another of those series that I remember being really excellent when I first read them years ago, and which on a second reading have got both better and slightly worse.

That's all down to the core concept. Reading Supreme Power for the first time, I didn't catch the fact that it's a pastiche of the Justice League, a concept that's so stunningly obvious that only the fact that I didn't read much in the way of DC when I first started reading comics and so didn't catch analogies to Green Lantern and Aquaman, who at that point were still obscure enough to not be a superhero I would recognise.

On reapproaching the series then there's al ot of extra depth in the story of Superman in the real world, a concept that's been done to death, but rarely so comprehensively or as well as it is here. The genius of Straczynski is in linking everything to Superman (Hyperion) arriving on earth - the emergence of a Godlike figure leads to the creation or revelation of others.

It's easy to draw parralels from this to the rise of cape comics in general, as Superman was one of the first comics to move away from the pulp action hero genre into full superheroics, and can be seen as the first great comic run, even if it wasn't the first superhero comic

Every other hero (and villain) stemming from the emergence of Hyperion is a nice way of representing this, and it adds an extra layer to a character who is at his best when inspiring others to greatness. It's further layered on by the fact that the majority of the action of humans in the comic are resolutely imperfect - they aren't inspired to do better, but to more horrendous actions.

It's a wonderful flip on the Superman mythos which usually just involves Superman 'turning' bad, either in reaction to tragedy - as in Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow, or Injustice: Gods Among Us - or simply being raised wrong - like in Red Son. The alternate version here is still a man with a strong moral compass, who still inspires, albeit one who is confused and lost, abandoned and persecuted by the Government that raised him. He is, in fact, a man who is raised without truth, or justice - the realpolitik American Way.

Anyway, this is a series that by this point is twelve issues in and has just had the first few team-ups between the Justice League analogues. It's a Superman book, in all but name, and anyone expecting much in the way of a team will be disappointed. Of the six superheroes shown only three ever interact at a time, and mainly for a few pages. In nearly every case they fight.

That's one of the issues - it's a team up book that doesn't contain much in the way of a team up. The second is that the last ten years have seen so many edgier, darker takes on the high-profile superteams of the Marvel and DC universe that it's hard to make an argument for this one more than any other. Millar's Ultimates, Ellis's The Authority and Planetary, even Garth Ennis on The Boys - all deconstructed the idea of superheroes and rewrote the rules of what superheroes could and couldn't do.

This is hardly pushing the envelope in terms of this; it's a realistic take on Superheroics, putting it into a context of what would happen rather than asking how far we can push these characters into darker pursuits.

Still, Supreme Power is well worth picking up if you like your comics grand in vision. It's a book that takes a while to take off, but when it does, it soars.

Also Try:
Mark Millar, The Ultimates
Grant Morrison, All Star Superman
Warren Ellis, The Authority

Friday, May 10, 2013

The Burning Mountain, Alfred Coppel

"BASED ON ACTUAL U.S. AND JAPANESE WAR PLANS, ONE OF THE MOST UNUSUAL AND POWERFUL WAR NOVELS EVER WRITTEN AN UNFORGETTABLE DRAMA OF HEROISM,LOVE AND SACRIFICE!"
















The Burning Mountain is a 'novel of the invasion of Japan', probably the least written about alternate World War Two strand. It's well researched, manages to portray at least one convincingly complex relationship between people from the two cultures, and teeters throughout on whether it wants to make this a full blown Jingoistic take on World War Two.

It's constantly in danger of over extending itself in its portrayal of Japanese culture and warfare. When this is used as a tool to show the superiority of the Allies over the NAZIs it's understandable. But the double standard meted out to the Japanese sits less comfortably. Whilst their war crimes were equally egregious, the overall storyarc of the book is that, disgusted by the use of civilians in defending their homeland, the US has no choice but to use Atomic weapons on Hiroshima.

Which is fine, except for the squeamishness about the way in which prisoner of war are treated, that the Japanese defend their home islands, the very fact that they choose to fight at all,  all of it is treated as though it's an alien concept, creating the idea that the Japanse are barbarians and that the bombing is a righteous one. It's an odd point to reach, when the moral highground is taken by the people murdering an entire city, in the name of preventing the civilians who will otherwise be forced to fight and die against the invading Americans.

There's a real sense of Allied superiority, whether in terms of the quantity or quality of arms and men they can throw at Japan, which is treated by the Japanese characters as growing evidence of their own inadequateness in the face of the American invaders.

Its sub-Turtledove dialogue, and introduction of characters to be killed a page later, add up to an unsatisfying novel, which short cuts to the end before any defining land battles can take place, and mostly skips over the wider conflicts in favour of small, guerrilla squad tactics and air battles between two totally outmatched forces.

Interesting for its use of Operation Coronet and Ketsugo only, stick with Turtledove for characterisation and description.

Also Try:
Harry Turtledove, Days of Infamy
Robert Conroy, 1945

Professor Moriarty: The Hound of the D'Urbervilles, Kim Newman

"Imagine the twisted evil twins of Sherlock Holmes and Doctor Watson and you have the dangerous duo of Professor James Moriarty - wily, snake-like, fiercely intelligent, terrifyingly unpredictable - and Colonel Sebastian Basher Moran - violent, politically incorrect, debauched. Together they run London crime, owning police and criminals alike. When a certain Irene Adler turns up on their doorstep with a proposition, neither man is able to resist. An entertaining and wickedly humorous crime adventure from the bestselling writer of Anno Dracula."











Supposedly written by Colonel Moran, colleague of Professor James Moriarty (from The Adventure of the Empty House), this is a loving pastiche of the Conan Doyle Holmes stories, victorian literature and pulp adventure novels. Literary mash-ups are fairly common, but this is one of the best, combining disparate plot strands from dozens of books and tying them all together around the skeletons of various Holmes shorts, from The Red Headed League to the Greek Interpreter, and, of course, Scandal, Hound and Falls.

Originally written as multiple short stories for magazines, they hold up remarkably well and the books format works terrifically. It helps that Moran, like Flashman before him, is the kind of easily readable rogue that makes base villainy so enjoyable. It's easy to compare these to a less inclusive Bond, but the real joy for anyone who has read Holmes is in picking out the references.

Newman's grasp of the wider genre is massive, as his work on Anno Dracula has shown, and references are peppered through the book which should encourage anyone reading to go and find out more. It rewards close reading, and the end notes give some insight into where more obscure characters come from. Realising that you're reading the other half, or a parallel, to a Holmes tale is great fun.

Anno Dracula may be more fun, but this is arguably more readble, and much like the Holmes books serves as a nice series to dip in and out of, with the short story nature of the tales making it easy to pick up and put down when you want to.

Also Try;
Alan Moore, League of Extraordinary Gentleman
Kim Newman, Anno Dracula,
Sir Arther Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes
Philip Jose Farmer, The Other Log of Phileas Fogg 

Uncanny X-Men, the Hidden Years, The Ghost and the Darkness; John Byrne

"Before House of M, before Onslaught, before the tragedy ofnthe Dark Phoenix, there were a handful of troubled teenagers and one man with a dream. Return to the X-Men's early days and discover the teams lost tales in this exclusive collection, expertly crafted by legendary comic book created John Byrne. The first seven issues of John Byrne's X-Men: The Hidden Years are collected in one titanic tome for the first time! This series chronicles the adventures of Marvel's original team of merry mutants after their Silver Age saga had run its course, and before the launch of the All-New, All-Different band of heroes. COLLECTING: X-Men : The Hidden Years 1-7"










This one is totally bizarre, a John Byrne scripted look back at the 'missing' adventures of the original X-Men team of Cyclops, Marvel Girl, Iceman, Angel and the Beast. Now, this is a time period ripe for rewriting, as it's widely agreed that the early first X-Men run was not very good, at least until Mutant Genesis and the second team came in.

The problem is that the idea of showing previously unseen adventures of the early team has been done better elsewhere, in First Class. Where as that contained a fresh start for the X-Men that welcomed new readers and old alike, this is a book that is only really relevant to those who have read the full early run, or at least enough to know about the Z-Nox and Professor X's decision to fake his death.

The behaviour of Iceman in particular only really works as part of a larger storyline, and casting the most (literally) chilled out of the original five X-Men as a hot head who quits the team in a huff seems a little bit odd. He's mostly absent for this story, which instead concentrate on Scott, Jean, Warren and Hank journeying to the Savage Land to find the body of Magneto and prove to the Professor that their enemy is truly dead.

Spoiler alert; he isn't.

Although he is a ghost for most of the book; because, the Savage Land.

The Savage Land is such a perfectly goofy comic book concept (mysterious zone in the antarctice circle where Dinosaurs, primitive humans and various other creatures still reside) that's so undervalued by the amount of time that's actually spent there. The stakes are always supposedly raised by a visit there and this never usually pays off, so it's nice to see something more than just the usual 'team turns up, fights a dinosaur, continues as normal' story, and some actual threat from the inhabitants.

Still, this lives up to the early X-Men reputation for being pretty weak. Definitely check out either First Class or All New X-Men instead.

Also Try:
Jeff Parker, X-Men: First Class
Brian Michael Bendis, All New X-Men
Mark Millar, Ultimate X-Men: Hellfire and Brimstone
Chris Claremont, Uncanny X-Men

Avengers: World Trust, Geoff Johns

"They are Earth's Mightiest Heroes, banded together from across the globe, united in their vow to protect the Earth from those enemies against whom no single super hero can stand alone... and this may be their greatest challenge. The capital cities of every nation on Earth have mysteriously vanished, throwing the planet into anarchy. In this time of extraordinary crisis, the nations of the world turn to the only organization capable of leading them through this time of strife and restoring political, economic and social order; the Avengers. They can defeat any super-villain, but can they govern the entire world?"









This is a totally different sort of Avengers book to the Jonathan Hickman one I read before it, and it's one that I have no real taste for. There's an interesting divergence in how Avengers fans feel about what makes a good Avengers book, and cast based controversy is hardly a new thing. Ever since Cap's kooky quartet replaced the classic Avengers line-up arguments have raged about who is and isn't an Avenger, and what the focus should be.

For my money I want an Avengers team that feels more grounded than the Justice League. Whilst any team that features a literal God as one of its founders is unlikely to be a picture of normality the Avengers have always been a team of every-men, certainly compared to the big hitters of the Justice League that features Superman (superstrong alien), Martian Manhunter (psychic, shape shifting Superman), Wonder Woman (Amazon and sometimes Demi-God) and Aquaman (Atlantean fish king).

The Marvel Universe as a whole has often been seen as a more flawed, realistic world compared to Dc. With that in mind I find Johns a bit hard to enjoy on Avengers. Sandwiched between the hugely popular Perez run at its height and the start of Bendis's decade long tenure at the helm it stands as a forgettable slice of filler. Of the four books I've read in his run I can only remember two (the Red Skull attacks Mt Rushmore with chemical weapons, and Thor fights the Avengers for the right to kill a Slavic dictator - with Iron Man's argument against intervention undermined somewhat by the way the Avengers happily use their UN backing here to remove a host of real life 'dictators' including the leaders of India).

If you want a good Avengers book, this isn't it. Johns has done better elsewhere, most notably on Green Lantern and Aquaman for DC. Those are both recommended highly. There's little of this to recommend. It's a wholly forgettable book, not helped by some truly third rate art that makes it look like they ran out of time and put it out half finished.

Also Try:
Brian Michael Bendis, New Avengers
Jonathan Hickman, Avengers
Kurt Busiek, Avengers
Mark Millar, The Ultimates